Nadal’s Juicy Serve

I’ve been watching the US Open this week and I’ve been amazed by several things:

1. Rafa Nadal’s new and improved serve.  The guy never served in the 130 mph’s before, and now he does.

2. The explanation for Rafa’s new serve: grip change.  Not the gym, not practice.  Nope.  He changed his grip ‘a couple of days’ before the tournament.

3. The appearance of Rafa in the broadcasting booth at the beginning of the quarterfinal match between Djokovic and Monfils.  I watch a lot of tennis, and never ever does a top player appear in the broadcast booth at the beginning of a match.  Topic of discussion?  Rafa’s new grip.  He just happened to have a racket with him to demonstrate it.

Item number 3 above had ‘control the message’ written all over it.

The big question is back up at #1:  How did Nadal develop a faster serve at this point in his tennis career?  No other tennis player has achieved such a feat.  Is Rafa on the juice?

I googled ‘tennis steroid’ and found the web site ‘Tennis Has a Steroid Problem.”  It’s an excellent site with gobs of interesting information and links to relevant material.

I’ve spent hours reading the site and the links, and the upshot is that not only am I reasonably sure that some players use PED’s (performance enhancing drugs), but also that the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) protects players.  From the must-read article “A Short History of Drugs in Tennis” –

In the first months of ‘04, 16 more players showed elevated test results for nandrolone, with the same analytic fingerprint as the previous positives and elevated negatives. According to the ATP, these players hailed from a dozen different countries, and their test results occurred at tournaments at different times in different parts of the world. Since there was no question now of contaminated ATP supplements, what explained these troubling elevated scores?

No explanation has ever been forthcoming. Except for Ulirach and Rusedski, none of the other players who tested positive for performance enhancers or showed trace amounts in their systems has ever been identified. The ATP has refused to say whether these players were required to have follow-up tests. Tennis fans have no way of knowing whether the six unnamed players won tournaments, perhaps even Grand Slam titles, during the time when they tested positive.

I’ve been a tennis fan for a long time, and I find it both sad and disgusting that the big business of tennis trumps fair play.  Say it ain’t so, Joe!

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

More:

Here’s a tennis professional wondering if Nadal is on the juice:

I can’t help but ask the question. I like the guy and his desire is unquestionable. His will to win is almost paralleled in his sport (perhaps Federer in a more quiet way matches him) or any other. But, isn’t that what everyone always said about Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens? I don’t know the answer and I’m not here to disparage the man’s name. He makes tennis exciting and we all know that tennis needs all the excitement possible to maintain interest in the sport. Without Nadal and Federer, the sport would be in trouble. That being said, I honestly can’t explain how a man can increase his serve speed 20% in a matter of months. How a man can run in a defensive manner for hours on end and still look ready for hours more. How a man can muscle balls into winners from awkward and bio-mechanically unsound positions. You tell me.  —Gene Desrochers

Nadal is on the record re: complaining about drug testing.  Read about it here.  (Okay, that article is an opinion piece responding to Rafa’s whining, but the point is that he whined.)

Why would a top player jeopardize his/her career by juicing?  It doesn’t make sense, yet we can name athletes in other sports who have.  A poster named Tennis Mom posits this over on the Tennis Has a Steroid Problem site:

We all know about lots of ambitious pro-athletes who doped to get the gold and lied about it. They may have been “so stupid” or just “so ambitious.”  They may also feel they “deserve” to juice because they practiced so much and their family sacrificed so much for their success.

More from A Short History of Drugs in tennis on how doping affects other players:

But then in September ‘80, Yannick Noah broke the silence in an interview with Rock & Folk, the French equivalent of Rolling Stone. While admitting that he smoked hashish, Noah accused other players of using cocaine. What’s more — and in his opinion what was worse — some were popping amphetamines. This infuriated him because it put clean players at a disadvantage. He lamented that they might have to use coke or amphetamines to stay competitive with drug abusers. He wanted the problem to be brought into the open and discussed. If it weren’t, Noah feared there would be deaths from overdoses.

The reaction of tennis authorities and the press was to savage Noah for smoking hashish. His remarks about coke and speed were ignored, as were the players whom he said “take the hit during a tournament and crash afterward. You have guys who have played super during one tournament and who you’ve never seen again.”  He mentioned Bjorn Borg and Victor Pecci by name.

Here’s a New York Times article on doping from 2009.

Bill Gifford questions tennis’ holier-than-thou image in this Slate article.

0 – 0 – 0 – 0 – 0

Well, there it is.  We went through this with baseball a few years ago.  At this point, I watch baseball knowing that players are using PED’s.  Now I’ll start doing the same with tennis.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

7 Responses to “Nadal’s Juicy Serve”

  1. Petrea Says:

    I’ve never been much interested in sports. Probably the way I was brought up, surrounded by academe. But it had nothing to do with corruption; I admired the players. Now I really don’t. It’s not about prowess or talent. Sad.

  2. Janey Says:

    Great articles. More and more people are questioning Nadal’s new “serve.” There’s so much more out there concerning him and doping, but the American public is just catching on to it now.

  3. altadenahiker Says:

    You’re just dizzy from all those candles you lit for Fed. And maybe you’re jealous because with my winnings, I can finally buy that toaster I always wanted.

  4. KLCR Says:

    If you had told me two weeks ago that I’d now be questioning some of the stuff I’ve seen in tennis during the past ten years, I wouldn’t have believed it.

    But here’s what I’ve learned: The ATP does not test for EPO or IGF-1. With regard to the testing the ATP actually does do, around 25% of out-of-competition testing does not happen on the first try (effectively giving the athlete a heads-up). To top that, some of the testing that is classified as ‘out of competition’ actually happens during competitions.

    Lack of testing for stuff that’s out there + sloppy testing = the distinct possibility that any player who wanted to could use performance enhancing drugs and get away with it. Or the uncle of a certain player.

  5. Tennis Posters Nadal Says:

    […] Nadal's Juicy Serve « West Coast Grrlie Blather A poster named Tennis Mom posits this over on the Tennis Has a Steroid Problem site: We all know about lots of ambitious pro-athletes who doped to get the gold and lied about it. They may have been “so stupid” or just “so ambitious. Jul 22, 2010 at 11:30 am […]

  6. problemsolvergene Says:

    KLCR,
    First, let me thank you for thinking enough of my thoughts to quote me here in your information-packed web post! Second, I read your post and much of the “steroids problem” site (thanks to other commentators who brought them to my attention) and agree that the ATP must be covering this stuff up.

    In Agassi’s book, he talks about how easily they accepted his excuse when he tested positive for a banned substance. Nadal and Federer are today’s Agassi and Sampras. Does anyone honestly believe that if Nadal tested positive, they would charge him and ban him from the sport for 2 years as others have been (Canas- reduced charge, Chela, Puerta). These players were third level in terms of audience draw, so no problem, let’s make an example of them. It’s vinyl window dressing to say that they have a no-tolerence policy, when in fact, they know that (a)almost no one tests positive because the users are years ahead of the testers, and (b)if a superstar tested positive, somehow, someway, it would be excused. Think about this: most athletes (Bonds, Clemens, McGwire) never actually tested positive, they were simply not believable and really were only convicted in the court of public opinion.

    Just like Michael Vick, they are forgiven no matter how heinous their acts. You think Nike would sit back and let some piddly association of athletes ruin a massive investment that sells millions and millions of dollars worth of shoes and shirts? Ha. If you believe that, then I have a grip that will increase your serve speed in a matter of days by 20-30 miles per hour…

  7. Inspiration From Friends Over at West Coast Grrlie Blather « Gene Desrochers' Tennis Coaching Says:

    […] See post that inspired this comment at West Coast Grrlie Blather! […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: